Studies and reports on the accuracy and feasibility of using electronic equipment for detection of coded wire tags on Pacific Salmon can be accessed from these document table.  

Non-copyright documents are listed in the top table and can be downloaded from this page. 

Copyright documents are listed in the bottom table and can be accessed from their DOI link

FileDescriptionFile Date
Detection Rate Comparison of Tube and Wand Coded Wire Tag Detectors on B-Strain Steelhead at Dworshak National Fish HatcheryUnpublished IDFG 1996 memo. This steelhead data was used in the 1997 PSC Ad-hoc SFEC, Coho ETD report.1997
Electronic Detection of Coded-Wire Tags in Chinook Salmon: A Comparison of Two Techniques Using a “Wand” DetectorBy: Ron Olson and Dietrich Schmitt, NWIFC. PSMFC RCMT 2001 Annual Meeting Minutes.2001
Reliability And Feasibility Of Using Electronic Detection for Recovery of Coded Wire Tags at Hatchery RacksBy: WDFW, no authors listed. Data used in the 1997 PSC Ad-hoc SFEC Coho ETD report.1997
Detection of Coded-Wire Tags in Chinook Salmon with the “Wand” DetectorBy Olson, R., K. Phillipson, and D. Zajac. Pp. 54-58 in Selective Fishery Evaluation Committee, 1998 Annual Report. Pacific Salmon Commission SFEC (99)-1.1999
T-Wand Detector Testing – Summary for Coded Wire Tag Improvement TeamBy: Geraldine Vander Hagen, NMT Inc.2012
Reliability and Feasibility of Using Electronic Detection for Recovery of Coded Wire Tags in Coho Salmon1997 PSC Ad-hoc SFEC Coho ETD (unpublished) report. Summary of agency field tests of the reliability of Wand and R-8 tube detection equipment in a variety of coho sampling situations prior to the implementation of coho Mass Marking and Mark Selective Fisheries. Summary report of 8 documents listed as attachments: 1. CDFO study: Report on the 1996 tests to electronically detect coded-wire tags. 2. NWIFC study: Evaluation of electronic detection for coded-wire tags in coho salmon (Oncorhynchus kisutch). 3. WDFW study: Reliability and feasibiliity of using electronic detection for recovery of coded wire tags at the hatchery rack. 4. WDFW study: Electronic coded-wire tag detection equipment study during 1996 coastal recreational fishery. 5. WDFW study: Electronic coded-wire tag detection equipment study during the 1996 treaty coho fishery. 6. WDFW study: Electronic coded-wire tag detection equipment study during the 1996 Puget Sound recreational fishery. 7. USFWS and IDFG study: Detection rate comparison of tube and wand coded wire tag detectors on B-stain steel head at Dworshak National Fish Hatchery, spring 1996. 8. Letter from Northwest Marine Technology, Inc. referencing commitments to upgrade electronic detection equipment.1997
Electronic Coded-Wire Tag Detection Equipment Study During the 1996 Puget Sound Recreational FisheryBy WDFW, no authors listed. Unpublished WDFW report. Data used in the 1997 PSC Ad-hoc SFEC Coho ETD report.1997
Electronic Coded-Wire Tag Detection Equipment Study During 1996 Coastal Recreational FisheryBy: WDFW, no authors listed. Unpublished WDFW report. Data used in the 1997 PSC Ad-hoc SFEC Coho ETD report.1997
1997 Electronic Sampling Tests R-8 Detector Sampling of Coho Hatchery Rack ReturnsBy: WDFW, no authors listed. PSMFC RCMT Annual Meeting Minutes 1998. Attachment 6.1998
Report on the 1996 Tests to Electronically Detect Coded-Wire TagsBy: J.O. Thomas and Associates and Susan Bates, CDF&O. Unpublished CDF&O report. Data used in the 1997 PSC Ad-hoc SFEC, Coho ETD report.1997
Marking Fishes and Invertebrates, III. Coded Wire Tags Useful in Automatic Recovery of Chinook Salmon and Steelhead TroutThe successful use of the coded wire tag (1 x 0.25mm, placed in snout) for marking of juvenile Pacific Salmon and steelhead trout migrating downstream in the Snake River is described.1974
Electronic Coded-Wire Tag Detection Equipment Study During the 1996 Treaty Coho FisheryBy Cynthia Pratt and Tim Flint, WDFW. Technical Report No. FRD97-02. Data used in the 1997 PSC Ad-hoc SFEC Coho ETD report.1997
A Field Test of the Counting Accuracy of the CWT-Tube Detector in the 1998 Area 5 Sockeye FisheryBy: Ken Phillipson, Robert Conrad, and Ron Olson. Unpublished NWIFC Report.1998
Evaluation of Electronic Detection for coded-Wire Tags in Coho Salmon (Onchorhynchus kisutch)By: Ron P. Olson and Ken Phillipson, NWIFC, 1997. Unpublished NWIFC report. Data used in the 1997 PSC Ad-hoc SFEC Coho ETD report.1997
Optimizing Detection of Coded Wire TagsPSMFC RCMT 2017 Meeting Materials. Slide Deck By: Northwest Marine Technology G.E. Vander Haegen, 2006.2006
Testing of Northwest Marine Technology’s Wand Detector on Chinook Salmon 1994PSMFC RCMT 1995 Annual Meeting Minutes, Attachment 16. By: ADFG, CWT and Otolith Processing Lab.1995
Electronic Screening of Troll Chinook HeadsADFG Unpublished Memo in PSMFC RCMT 2005 Annual Meeting Minutes, Attachment 11. By: Ron Josephson, ADFG.2005
Chinook Salmon DFO T-Wand Study Detection Settings Comparison 2013-2014PSMFC RCMT 2015 Meeting Materials: Slide Deck By Kathy Fraser, CDFO. Presentation slides on comparing accuracy of T-wands at “standard” and “new” settings for detecting CWTs in Chinook Salmon.2015
Comparison of Survival of Coho Salmon Coded Wire Tagged With standard and Double Length Coded Wire Tags and Adult Electronic DetectionPSMFC RCMT 1996 Annual Meeting Minutes, Attachment 14. By H. Lee Blankenship, Daniel A. Thompson, and Lynn M. Anderson. WDFW. The Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife·(WDFW) began conducting a study in March 1994 to determine the effect on survival and possible straying of coho salmon (Oncorhynchus kistuch) tagged with standard and double length coded wire tags (CWT). A second aspect of the study was to test the effectiveness of electronic detection using wand CWT detectors on returning adult coho. The study was conducted at the WDFW George Adams hatchery on 1992 brood coho averaging 16 g per fish (115 mm fl). During the fall of 1995 all adipose clipped returning coho to the George Adams hatchery were electronically sampled for the presence of a CWT using a Northwest Marine Technology Wand CWT detector.1996

List of copyright documents:

(Note, as we are making non-copyright document directly accessible from the above table we are temporarily including these in the below list)

Ebel, W. J. 1974. Marking fishes and invertebrates. III. Coded wire tags useful in automatic recovery of chinook salmon and steelhead trout. Marine Fisheries Review 36(7):10-13. https://spo.nmfs.noaa.gov/sites/default/files/pdf-content/MFR/mfr367/mfr3673.pdf

Fraser, K. 2013/2014. Chinook Salmon – DFO T-Wand Study 2013/2014. CDFO. https://docs.cbfwl.org/RCMT/Fraser_Chinook Salmon DFO T-Wand Study 2013-2014.pdf

Olson, R., K. Phillipson, and A. Shaffer, NWIFC. Preliminary Results of a Wand Study on Hatchery Chinook. PSMFC RCMT 2010 Annual Meeting Minutes, Attachment 6. Powerpoint of field study to determine if mouth wanding is still needed with improved detection range of NMT wands. https://docs.cbfwl.org/RCMT/Olson_Preliminary%20Results%20of%20a%20Wand%20Study%20on%20Hatchery%20Chinook.pdf

Vander Haegen, G., and L. Blankenship. Advances in coded wire tag technology: meeting changing fish management objectives. Pages 127-140 in Wolf, K. S., and O’Neal, J. S., editors. PNAMP Special Publication: tagging, telemetry and marking measures for monitoring fish populations: a compendium of new and recent science for use in informing technique and decision modalities. Pacific Northwest Aquatic Monitoring Partnership Special Publication 2010-002 https://pnamp.org/cms/assets/TTM%20Chap08_0.pdf